If a bishop, priest or deacon is convicted of a criminal offence against children and is sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment of 12 months or more, then it would normally be right to initiate the process of laicisation. Failure to do so would need to be justified. Initiation of the process of laicisation may also be appropriate in other circumstances.
(Nolan, 2001, 3.5.32, p44).

Search This Blog

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Apology for Manchester abuse long overdue - letter published by 'The Tablet' 24 March 2011

See http://www.thetablet.co.uk/letters-extra.php 24 March 2011

After several long months of waiting, I am pleased to see that Bishop Terence Brain of Salford has finally issued an "apology" about the horrifying abuse reported as being perpetrated against children by Mgr Thomas Duggan ("Bishop apologises for abuse at Manchester school", The Tablet, 17 March). However, I note that it has taken the diocese and the bishop an extraordinarily long time to make any public announcement about these events.

Fr Barry O'Sullivan has been the Child Protection /Safeguarding Coordinator in the diocese of Salford since 2001 and admits to hearing "stories" about Mgr Duggan, since 1987. So why has the diocese waited until 2011, before acknowledging the pain and distress suffered by those affected?

Philip Gilligan, Rochdale

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Archbishop Kelly should be questioned about this and other matters elsewhere in Salford Diocese at the time
He was both at St Bede's and then Bishop of Salford

McCavity's cat comes to mind -not there when accounts are to be settled

Peter C said...

The first compliants about Duggan go back to 1950 and continued ever since. So the catholic church has being protecting their system for 61 years up to now.
Remember the Soviets kept their appalling crimes secret for more than 70 years.